The Mind as Revolution: Psychological Reform Towards a Democratic Society

लेखक

  • Oishee Bhattacharjee प्रेसिडेंसी कॉलेज image/svg+xml ##default.groups.name.author##

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.66871/trf-j.v1i2.005

##semicolon##

Caste, Ambedkar, Patriarchy, Reform, Democracy, Psychological Reform, Gramsci · Fanon

सार

This paper examines the complex relationship between caste, gender, and democracy in India through the writings of B. R. Ambedkar and feminist scholars such as Uma Chakravarti. It argues that Brahminical patriarchy, deeply embedded in religious practices and legitimised through scriptures, continues to structure social relations and political life in contemporary India. Despite constitutional guarantees of equality and repeated political reforms, caste-based hierarchies and gendered domination remain firmly entrenched, limiting the democratic ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity. Drawing on Ambedkar's critique of social reform and Chakravarti's analysis of caste gender relations, the paper highlights how caste operates not only as a political or economic system but also as a deeply internalised social consciousness. Engaging with Frantz Fanon's theorisation of colonial consciousness and Antonio Gramsci's concept of hegemony, and with Gopal Guru's analysis of Dalit humiliation, it introduces the concept of psychological reform to emphasise the need for an inner transformation that involves unlearning inherited hierarchies, moral prejudices, and social instincts. The paper argues that without such psychological reform, democratic transformation in India remains incomplete and largely symbolic.

 

 

##submission.authorBiography##

  • ##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

    Pursuing M.A. in Political Science from Presidency University, Kolkata

##submission.citations##

Ambedkar, B. R. (1936). Annihilation of caste. In Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and speeches (Vol. 1, pp. 37–96). Dr. Ambedkar Foundation (2014 ed.).

Ambedkar, B. R. (1951). The rise and fall of the Hindu woman: Who was responsible for it? In Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar writings and speeches (Vol. 17-II, pp. 109–129). Education Department, Government of Maharashtra (2003 ed.).

Chakravarti, U. (1993). Conceptualising Brahmanical patriarchy in early India: Gender, caste, class and state. Economic and Political Weekly, 28(14), 579–585. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4399556

Fanon, F. (1952). Black skin, white masks (C. L. Markmann, Trans.). Grove Press (1967 ed.).

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). Lawrence and Wishart.

Guru, G. (2009). Humiliation: Claims and context. Oxford University Press.

Kothari, R. (1970). Caste in Indian politics. Orient Longman.

Marriott, M. (1968). Caste ranking and food transactions: A matrix analysis. In M. Singer & B. S. Cohn (Eds.), Structure and change in Indian society (pp. 133–171). Aldine.

Poddar, U., & Lukiv, J. (2024). Shoe thrown at India's top judge in religious row. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c80g4d5epm8o

Pradhan, P., Das, P., & Sahoo, S. (2023). The politics of the plate: Caste and consumption in joothan. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 4(2), 5881–5885. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.61355881

Press Information Bureau. (2025, March 19). Women in Panchayati Raj institutions. Government of India.

Ramabai, P. (1888). The high-caste Hindu woman. Press of the J. B. Rodgers Printing Co.

Singh, S., & Sonker, D. B. (2025). Women in Panchayati Raj: Leading from the front or controlled from the shadows? Indian Journal of Legal Review, 5(1), 692–699.

##submission.downloads##

प्रकाशित

2026-05-05

##plugins.generic.recommendBySimilarity.heading##

##plugins.generic.recommendBySimilarity.advancedSearchIntro##