Decolonized Arms Control And Disarmament In South Asia

लेखक

  • Kamlesh Kumar Ram दिल्ली विश् वविद्यालय image/svg+xml ##default.groups.name.author##

##semicolon##

Arms control, South Asia Decolonization, nuclear Politics, Postcolonial Disarmament.

सार

This paper studies the theoretical and practical outline of decolonizing arms control and disarmament in South Asia. It conquers that mainstream, West -centric models of arms control ineffectively address the historical, political and epistemic specificity of the region. Building on decolonial theory and regional security studies, the paper outlines a framework that centers native security narratives, historical experiences of colonialism and symmetric power relations among state and external actors. The evaluation focuses on three arenas: nuclear arms and principals, conventional force stances along disputed borders, and multilateral regimes and norms. Depiction on policy literature and current regional analysis, the paper suggests a set of politically programmatic and ethically landed policy measures-ranging from confidence-building measures and bilateral consulting bodies to plural, region-led normative initiative that inclusively aim to reduce insecurity while reorganizing local environment. The paper concludes with suggestions for scholars, policy makers, and civil society aimed at reformulating arms control as a decolonial practice in south Asia.

 

##submission.citations##

Acharya, Amitav. Rethinking Power, Institutions, and Ideas in World Politics: Whose I.R.? Routledge, 2014.

Ackerly, Brooke A. “Feminist and Postcolonial Theories of International Relations.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal, 143–62. Oxford University Press, 2005.

Bajpai, Kanti. “Indian Conceptions of Order.” In Empires, Systems and States: Great Transformations in International Politics, edited by Michael Cox, Tim Dunne, and Ken Booth, 217–34. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Boesche, Roger. The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and His Arthashastra. Lexington Books, 2002.

Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia University Press, 1977.

Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford University Press, 2000.

Chakrabarti, Arindam. The Blooming of a Thousand Schools: A History of Indian Philosophy. Penguin, 2013.

Chousalkar, Ashok S. Revisiting the Political Thought of Ancient India: Pre-Kautilyan, Kautilyan, and Post-Kautilyan. Sage Publications, 2007.

Creel, Abner B. “Dharma as an Ethical Category Relating to Freedom and Responsibility.” Philosophy East and West 25, no. 2 (1975): 155–68.

Dalton, Dennis. Mahatma Gandhi: Nonviolent Power in Action. Columbia University Press, 1993.

Galtung, Johan. The Way Is the Goal: Gandhi Today. Gujarat Vidyapith, Peace Research Center, 1992.

Gandhi, M. K. An Autobiography: The Story of My Experiments with Truth. Navajivan Publishing House, 1927.

Ganguly, Sumit. “Kautilya’s Mandala and the Balance of Power in Ancient India.” India Review 16, no. 1 (2017): 1–15.

Hobson, John M. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Jackson, Robert. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford University Press, 2000.

Kapur, Sumit P. “The Arthashastra and the Continuity of Ancient Indian Statecraft.” Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs 2, no. 4 (2019): 78–94.

Kautilya. The Arthashastra. Translated by L. N. Rangarajan. Penguin Classics, 1992.

Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press, 1984.

Krishna, Sankaran. Globalization and Postcolonialism: Hegemony and Resistance in the Twenty-First Century. Rowman & Littlefield, 2009.

Kumar, Pradeep. The Mandala Matrix: Kautilyan Strategy in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press, 2018.

Mantena, Rama. “The Paradox of the Modern State: Gandhi and the Critique of Political Violence.” American Political Science Review 106, no. 2 (2012): 409–25.

Mearsheimer, John J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Company, 2001.

Modelski, George. “Kautilya: Foreign Policy and International System in the Ancient Hindu World.” American Political Science Review 58, no. 3 (1964): 549–60.

Nayar, Baldev Raj, and T. V. Paul. India in the World Order: Searching for Major-Power Status. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Patel, Sujata. “Beyond the State of Nature: Advaita Vedanta and the Concept of Global Community.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 48, no. 3 (2020): 291–310.

Saran, Paramjit. “The Theory of Sovereignty in Ancient India.” The Indian Journal of Political Science 25, no. 1 (1964): 1–12.

Seth, Sanjay. “Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40, no. 1 (2011): 167–83.

Shani, Giorgio. “Toward a Post-Western I.R.: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory.” International Studies Review 10, no. 4 (2008): 722–34.

Sharma, Raghav. “Dharma and Diplomacy: India’s Quest for a New World Order.” Journal of South Asian Studies 38, no. 2 (2015): 215–30.

Sharp, Gene. The Politics of Nonviolent Action. Porter Sargent Publishers, 1973.

Sihag, B. S. Kautilya: The True Founder of Economics. Vitasta Publishing, 2014.

Singh, Aman. “Rethinking Sovereignty through Ahimsa: A Gandhian Challenge to the Westphalian State.” Third World Quarterly 42, no. 9 (2021): 2045–61.

Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1979.

Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46, no. 2 (1992): 391–425.

Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press, 1999.

##submission.downloads##

प्रकाशित

2026-01-10