Gen Z Mobilisation and Political Uprisings in South Asia: A Comparative Study of Bangladesh and Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66871/trf-j.v1i3.007Keywords:
Gen Z, Mobilisations, Nepal, Bangladesh, Political UprisingAbstract
This study addresses the question of how, when, and why young people in South Asia have become an important political force by examining the experiences of youth-led mobilisation and uprisings in Bangladesh versus Nepal. The paper, which is at the intersection of comparative politics and International Relations, examines the impact of digital nativity, socio-economic grievances and transformations in political identities on the nature of youth participation in the present. It examines some of the reasons why Gen Z mobilisation may be occurring in these contexts. How and why do digital platforms affect the nature of contentious politics in different ways?
This study's theoretical frameworks include contentious politics and the political opportunity structure, indicating that Gen Z uprisings are not arbitrary but rather coordinated responses to poor governance, unemployment, corruption, and disillusionment with democracy. This study uses secondary literature, media reports, and digital discourse analysis of social media to trace patterns of mobilisation and state reactions, using the qualitative comparative case study method.
The initial investigation suggests that digital mobilisation and youth-led opposition culture are strong in both Bangladesh and Nepal. The uprisings take different paths and have different effects, depending on regime type, state capacity, and political openness. The political system and mobilisation in Bangladesh are more episodic and constrained than in Nepal. Nepal has a more democratic political system that enables sustained youth mobilisation. The study contributes to a better understanding of Gen Z as an important stakeholder in the restructuring of state–society relations in the digital era. It is also important in the ongoing conversation about youth politics, democratic change, and the stability of the South Asian region.
References
Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. “The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661.
Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dalton, Russell J. 2008. “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation.” Political Studies 56 (1): 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x.
Deibert, Ronald. 2015. “Authoritarianism Goes Global: Cyberspace under Siege.” Journal of Democracy 26 (3): 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0041.
Foa, Roberto Stefan, and Yascha Mounk. 2016. “The Democratic Disconnect.” Journal of Democracy 27 (3): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0049.
Hachhethu, Krishna. 2007. “Party-Building in Nepal: Organization, Leadership and People.” South Asia Journal.
Honwana, Alcinda. 2012. The Time of Youth: Work, Social Change, and Politics in Africa. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
Lewis, David. 2011. Bangladesh: Politics, Economy and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: PublicAffairs.
Norris, Pippa. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Riaz, Ali. 2019. “Youth and Politics in Bangladesh: Trends and Challenges.” Asian Survey 59 (6): 1052–1074. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2019.59.6.1052.
Shirky, Clay. 2011. “The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change.” Foreign Affairs 90 (1): 28–41.
Snellinger, Amanda. 2018. Making New Nepal: From Student Activism to Mainstream Politics. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Tarrow, Sidney. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, Charles. 2004. Social Movements, 1768–2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Research Frontline - Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.